NIAD-QE verifies the solidity of its awarding of academic degrees by means of various surveys. Considering social demand for the diversification of learning opportunities at the higher education level, NIAD-QE also researches ways to evaluate the learning outcomes needed to award academic degrees to people who have studied in various ways and on various occasions throughout their lives. Another key task undertaken by NIAD-QE is conducting international comparative studies of degree systems, with a primary focus on the quality and international recognition of Japanese academic degrees, along with the identification of relevant issues.

1. Studies and Research on the Assessment of Learning Outcomes as a Requirement for an Academic Degree, and Recognition of Academic Degrees

There is a growing interest in the value of academic degrees for providing evidence of having completed areas of higher education. This is due to an increased number of learners in higher education, together with intensive movements of people across national borders. NIAD-QE aims to establish a theoretical basis for academic degree and credit systems by means of comparative studies focused on Japan and other countries. In doing so, it examines the institutional conditions for the proper recognition of academic degrees and other higher education qualifications by higher education institutions and labor markets alike. NIAD-QE also looks at the systematic nature of learning required at the higher education level to culminate in the award of an academic degree.

2. Research on the Functions of NIAD-QE’s Awarding of Academic Degrees

NIAD-QE’s research into future approaches to awarding academic degrees is informed by its efforts to identify and analyze the current status of its program for awarding academic degrees, along with society’s requirements of degree award systems. In particular, NIAD-QE conducts research that focuses on methods of evaluating various forms of learning at non-university educational institutions, and then assessing the relevant credit hours. In addition, NIAD-QE examines the significance of―and potential for improving―systems for awarding Bachelor’s degrees based on the accumulation of these credit hours. In doing so, it bears in mind the key question of what form higher education should take to ensure that it is open to people in diverse conditions who are exploring varying careers. NIAD-QE also conducts a questionnaire and other follow-up surveys of those who have continued learning following the completion of their education at a junior college, college of technology, professional training college, or similar institution, and who have received a Bachelor’s degree from NIAD-QE. The results of analysis of these surveys are reflected in NIAD-QE’s system for the awarding of academic degrees.

---